Skip to content

How does composure protect your peace during conflict?

Suppose a neighbour accuses you of leaving the shared garden tap running. You remember turning it off after watering, and you say so. They answer that you never think about anyone else.

There are now two conversations available. One concerns the running tap: who used it, whether it closes properly and what needs doing about it. The other concerns whether you can defeat an insulting account of your character.

Composure helps you stay with the conversation that needs an answer. It gives you room to decide what to say before the accusation supplies the whole response.

A Spark from The Vision

I'm in love with peace of mind, and married to composure.

You may want to mention every careless thing the neighbour has ever done. Some of it may be true. Bringing it all forward would still make a different argument, with more to defend on both sides and no clearer understanding of the tap.

“I turned it off when I finished. Let’s check whether it’s still dripping” keeps the relevant fact in view. You have contradicted the accusation without accepting the invitation to exchange a history of grievances.

The neighbour may refuse to check the tap and continue making personal remarks. Your composed answer cannot make them reasonable. You can offer to look at the leak later, state that you turned the tap off and leave the personal charges unanswered. This gives the actual concern a place to be dealt with without allowing the quarrel to claim the rest of the afternoon.

In No altercations, Innocent describes his attachment to peace of mind and composure. Needless arguments disturb the calm he needs to think and work on his life. He is particularly unwilling to spend that time fighting for an edge or trying to look cleverer than someone else.

The cost he describes extends beyond the exchange. You had planned to spend the afternoon repairing a wooden chair. Its loose joints need cleaning and fitting before you glue them. You enjoy this work and have set aside time to do it carefully.

After the argument, you sit down with the pieces and discover that you are barely looking at them. You are rehearsing what you should have said. You fit the same joint twice without noticing why it will not sit square. The disagreement has begun to occupy the attention you need for something else.

Leave yourself room to think

At the chair, recovering your concentration may take longer than closing the conversation. Put down the glue until you can follow what you are doing. You can be angry about the accusation and still decide that another imagined reply will not help you understand the joint in your hands.

When you look again, a piece of old glue is preventing the parts from meeting. Removing it lets you fit them properly. This is the kind of thought the argument was interrupting: patient attention to what is actually in front of you, with a result you care about.

The tap still needs checking. If it turns out that you left it running, you can acknowledge that; if it is faulty, it needs a repair of its own. Neither question requires the chair to remain untouched while you defend your entire character. Composure has protected enough room for the afternoon to contain work you chose, even with an unpleasant exchange still unresolved.

AI-generated from Innocent Mwatsikesimbe's writing.

Keep a Spark close

Read Spreuke on Android and receive a new Spark each morning.

Get it on Google Play

See what is in the app →