When is patience wise, and when have you waited too long?
In As patient as death, Innocent finds an unsettling example of patience. Death waits a lifetime without abandoning its end. He admires that willingness to allow the required time, while making an important distinction: human patience has to be selective.
Waiting longer is not always wise. The question is whether the time still serves something worth continuing, or whether the wait has become a way of avoiding a necessary change.
A Spark from From Chaos to Order
As strange as it might sound, I am inspired by death's perfect patience; the kind that fulfills the required wait and wins in the end.
Death’s certainty is not available to us. We can give years to an effort that does not succeed. We can also abandon something useful because it has not produced the result as quickly as we hoped. The length of the wait alone cannot tell us which is happening.
Consider a neglected cupboard of household papers. Finding anything has become difficult, and you have decided to put it in order. After an evening’s work, much of the cupboard still looks as it did before. You have identified some papers, gathered others together and found a document you thought was missing.
It would be easy to dismiss the evening because the cupboard is not finished. Yet something has changed. The next search has a better starting point. Continuing a little at a time gives the work a chance to become useful without requiring one exhausting session to complete it.
Now suppose one part depends on a copy somebody promised to send. You have asked again, received no answer and stopped sorting anything else while you wait.
That is a different use of time. The larger task still matters, but this particular wait may no longer be helping it. You can ask whether the copy is available elsewhere, continue with the papers you have or leave a clear note about what remains missing. You need not abandon the whole effort to stop depending on that one response.
Some processes are harder to read than a cupboard. Learning, recovery and rebuilding trust may include stretches when no improvement is obvious. A quiet period does not prove that nothing is happening. Nor does wanting an outcome badly establish that time will produce it.
You need reasons appropriate to the situation. What has to happen before the result is possible? Is the work that could bring it about continuing? Has something changed that calls for a different response? If you do not know, asking someone who understands the process may be more useful than setting yourself an arbitrary deadline.
Innocent connects selective patience with listening to reality. He also names a commitment on which he does not intend to lose patience: maintaining the order of his life. That larger commitment can survive a change in the particular things he waits for.
You can be patient with the work of making life more manageable and impatient with an arrangement that keeps it stuck. Continuing does not always mean giving the same person, method or promise another month. Sometimes it means finding a way forward that no longer depends on the wait.
Related lessons
AI-generated from Innocent Mwatsikesimbe's writing.
Keep a Spark close
Read Spreuke on Android and receive a new Spark each morning.