Can comfort make it harder to understand other people's struggles?
“Could you stay with your family for a while?”
It can be a kind suggestion to someone who is struggling to pay rent. It can also assume a great deal: that there is room, that their family can afford another person, and that going home would mean being welcomed and helped.
If you have always been able to rely on that welcome, it may barely register as part of your own security. You know that losing your income would be frightening, but you also know whom you would call. Someone without that person faces a different problem. Comfort can make their struggle harder to understand when you mistake the support behind your choices for something everyone has.
A Spark from Vicissitudes of Life
Where you are privileged, you are disadvantaged multiple times more: you don't know how cold the world can get if you're locked up in a warm house all day.
In “Everything and nothing”, Innocent describes a financial collapse that affected his family just as he needed help beginning his adult life. Some relatives were struggling themselves. Others who could have helped were unwilling. He lost material comfort and discovered that people he had counted on were not necessarily available to him.
The warm house in the Spark carries that painful discovery. From inside a protected life, you may have no occasion to learn what happens when money runs out and the people you expected to help cannot or will not do so. Their absence changes more than the amount you can spend. It changes which choices are open to you.
Imagine two people considering a move to a new town for work. Each can manage the deposit and moving costs, but neither will have much left afterwards. One knows that, if the first pay arrives late, a parent can cover a month’s rent. The other has nobody to ask.
The first person may see moving as an uncomfortable but reasonable risk. The second may need to wait. Calling the second person less ambitious would miss the difference between the decisions. The moving costs are the same; the consequences of running short are not.
Thinking through a comparison like this can reveal an assumption. It cannot tell you the full experience of living without help. You still need to hear from the person whose choice you are trying to understand. They may be weighing a difficulty you have not thought of at all.
That requires leaving room for their answer to change your view. If they explain why they cannot go home, immediately suggesting another relative can turn the conversation into a defence of your advice. You may be trying to find a solution, while they are repeatedly being asked to establish that the difficulty is real.
Innocent looks back on his losses as experiences that changed his sense of what mattered. He came to value time, knowledge and skill differently. His account also includes hurt and a family that never fully recovered. The understanding he gained belongs alongside those losses; it does not make suffering something another person needs for their own good.
You do not have to lose your security before taking someone else’s account seriously. When a friend says there is nobody they can stay with, you can let that be new information rather than an objection to overcome. “I didn’t realise going home wasn’t an option. What are you considering now?” begins a conversation about the choices they actually have.
Related lessons
AI-generated from Innocent Mwatsikesimbe's writing.
Keep a Spark close
Read Spreuke on Android and receive a new Spark each morning.
